Undercurrents: beneath the obvious

December 3, 2006

Bottler (Nestle) aims to take more from rivers

The Muskegon Chronicle has this update on the plans of Nestle Waters North America Inc. to expand its bottling operations. Does an ecosystem care where the water that is withdrawn ends up — does it care if the water goes in a bottle of shampoo, a soft drink or a bottle of water?

Nestle, which bottles water in Michigan under the Ice Mountain label, currently bottles about 270 million gallons of spring water annually at its sprawling facility in Stanwood, company officials said. That water comes from underground springs in rural Mecosta County and the city of Evart’s municipal water system.

Nestle is seeking state permission to pump 70 million gallons of spring water annually from the headwaters of two trout streams that flow into the Muskegon River near Evart in Osceola County. If approved, that project would reduce the annual flow of the Muskegon River by 70 million gallons, according to company documents.

Nestle also is considering seeking permission to pump millions of gallons of spring water each month from a site in Newaygo County’s Monroe Township that is the headwaters of the White and Pere Marquette rivers.

Neither the Pere Marquette Watershed Council nor the White River Watershed Partnership has taken a formal position on Nestle’s proposal.

Nestle officials will explain their plans at a Jan. 10 public meeting at the Monroe Township Hall.

Company spokeswoman Deb Muchmore said Nestle wants to develop more water wells so that it can meet increased demand for Ice Mountain spring water without harming nearby surface waters.

Nestle plans to announce in late 2007 where it will build a second water bottling plant. That facility will be built either in Evart, northeast of Big Rapids, or at a site in Indiana, Muchmore said.

Muchmore said the new bottling plant will be the same size as the Stanwood facility, which spans 739,000 square feet, cost $150 million to build and cranks out about a half billion individual bottles of water annually, according to company reports.

Noah Hall, a Wayne State University law professor, said there is no state or federal law that defines whether bottling pure water is any different, legally speaking, than pumping water out of the ground and using it as an ingredient in other beverages or food products.

Tags: , ,



  1. I think Nestle should stop taking water from the Great Lakes. I have done research and I have found the they can take water from the ocean for a lot less and make it safe to drink with some chromosome thing. But this way is a lot smarter.

    Comment by Rebecca — April 3, 2007 @ 9:20 am | Reply

  2. Rebecca, thanks for the comment. I’d be interested in knowing if you think all companies that bottle products with Great Lakes water should stop or do you think only Nestle should? Coca-Cola has 21 bottlers in Michigan — see here for list:


    Coca-Cola bottles may products including their own brand of water — Dasani. Coca-Cola products are mostly water anyway. Do you think Coca-Cola should stop taking water from the Great Lakes?

    Comment by nemo — April 3, 2007 @ 11:42 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: